Oh my, I shouldn’t be wasting brain cells on this, but it is kind of a cultural/political issue. There’s all this whining in the Swedish and British media about the Eurovision result, accusing Eastern Europe of shadowy voting procedures (i.e. multiple voting by SMS) and eastern bloc pacts and stuff. Some people are even proposing a musical iron curtain with an East-Eurovision and a West-Eurovision. I have a few points to make.
1. Voting is done by country, not by total number of votes cast, so an individual voting by SMS more than once skews their country’s result, not the overall result. One could argue that since all countries get to cast the same number of votes then individual votes in countries with small populations count more (Kind of like the Electoral College in the U.S. being skewed toward the Red(neck) states). Since there are lots of little countries in Eastern Europe, perhaps the voting is slightly skewed in that direction (but then, this is the case for Scandinavia too). On the other hand, the UK, Germany, France, and Spain are automatically entered into the final no matter how bad their songs are, I assume because, as the biggest countries in Europe, they provide the bulk of the viewing audience. So, you know, who really has the advantage here?
2. The Swedish entry was mediocre and the British entry was total crap, so they have nothing to whine about. The only entries from Western Europe that I liked were France and Germany. But I never expect the masses to like what I like, so I wasn’t really surprised that they didn’t win.
3. So Eastern Europe did well this year. But hello? This is ONE YEAR. Finland won last year and Greece the year before. Western Europe can’t handle those second-class citizens in the East winning just once? Racist jerks.
4. Eastern Europe voting by bloc? Who did Sweden get almost all of its points from? Denmark, Finland, Iceland, and Norway. Everybody votes for their neighbors. It’s lame, but not surprising. So maybe they need to change the rules so that countries can’t vote for their neighbors either. And finally…
5. It’s Eurovision. It’s silly. It’s fun to get drunk and watch it and see what kind of insanity is going on in the pop music world. It doesn’t really matter who wins.


4 comments
18 May 2007 at 7:17 am
don
I think it was Martin Scorsese, if I remember, who said something like, it doesn’t make sense to have a competition for such things as music and art and film, as those things are a matter of taste.
It makes for a good TV show however.
18 May 2007 at 10:12 am
Anonymous
Hi! Swedish song was really nice for a live show that you can see on the real stage not in the tube. Live final broadcast was a killing factor for the show they’ve made on stage. They looked completly different and not so interesting as we saw them at the rehearsal on previous day. The same thing with some other songs too (Lithuania, France, Belgium).
18 May 2007 at 10:12 am
Anonymous
It was my comment :)…
Vadik
19 May 2007 at 1:11 pm
looby
Thanks so much for moving to WordPress – it’s so much more user-friendly for those of us who are too old to be deciphering impossible capcha texts and “logging in”.
I’m also glad that Serbia won. Firstly, becauwe it will force Serbia to come to terms with the fact that there are ging to thousands of openly gay people wandering around the city next May, because a lesbian won for their country. In a country which has a pretty ropey record for gay rights, this will be a good corrective for them.
Secondly, if you are sad enough to read the semi-final and voting records (http://eurovision.tv/) you will see that although Serbia picked up a lot of votes from E Europe, she also achieved 12 or 10 from Austria, Switizerland and most of Scandinavai. It was simply a popular song.
To be honest I can’t stand it myself – I voted for Georgia, Turkey, Lithuania, Austria and the Netherlands – but the fact is that a lot of people did.